GRID K220Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
When comparing GRID K220Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Iris Pro Graphics 580 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 64 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 448 GB more memory, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 395 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Battlefield 5 is 185% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 580 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT4e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 72 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |