GRID K220Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

When choosing between GRID K220Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K220Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.

GRID K220Q

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Check Price

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K220Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB
Display Connectors	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 345 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 520% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	3−4	30−35
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	9−10
low / 720p	12−14	70−75
medium / 1080p	4−5	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 600% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K220Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	85−90	200−210
ultra / 1080p	35−40	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	100−110
4K / 2160p	10−11	55−60
high / 768p	60−65	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 156% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	55−60
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	40−45	110−120
ultra / 1080p	18−20	85−90
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 147% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	2−3	27−30
ultra / 1080p	2−3	24−27
QHD / 1440p	−	20−22
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	9−10	55−60
medium / 1080p	3−4	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 775% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	35−40
ultra / 1080p	5−6	27−30
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
low / 720p	45−50	130−140
medium / 1080p	7−8	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	3−4	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	16−18
4K / 2160p	−	14−16
low / 720p	14−16	75−80
medium / 1080p	5−6	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 550% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	40−45	110−120
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	3−4	45−50
ultra / 1080p	2−3	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	9−10
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 275% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	1−2	14−16
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−12
QHD / 1440p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	3−4	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 1200% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	75−80
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 117% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	7−8	80−85
medium / 768p	6−7	50−55
high / 1080p	3−4	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
4K / 2160p	0−1	9−10
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 980% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GRID K220Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K220Q	Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	GK104	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 July 2014	15 August 2020
Pipelines	1536	96
Core clock speed	745 MHz	400 MHz
Boost Clock		1350 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	5.1
OpenGL	4.6
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K220Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares