GRID K220Q vs Quadro 5010M
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro 5010M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5010M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 ECC |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro 5010M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 295 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3700 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Battlefield 5 is 228% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5010M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Dota 2 is 59% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Fortnite is 105% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 225% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 5010M in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro 5010M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | N12E-Q5 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |