GRID K220Q vs Quadro FX 4800
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 4800. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 4800. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K220Q
Quadro FX 4800
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1536 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
- GRID K220Q has 50% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro FX 4800 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1024 GB more memory, than GRID K220Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro FX 4800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 143 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 4800 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 9% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro FX 4800 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro FX 4800 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GT200B |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 11 November 2008 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 602 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 38.53 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 1.3 |