GRID K220Q vs Quadro K1100M
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro K1100M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K1100M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro K1100M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K1100M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K1100M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K1100M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 400% more power consumption, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K1100M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K1100M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K1100M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 40 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K1100M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K1100M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro K1100M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Fortnite is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro K1100M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K1100M in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K1100M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | GK107 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 22.59 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 542.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 44.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 18 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |