GRID K220Q vs Quadro K2200M

In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro K2200M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K2200M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GRID K220Q

Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

	GRID K220Q	Quadro K2200M
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	65 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs

GRID K220Q has 246% more power consumption, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 78 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
GRID K220Q and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K2200M is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	20−22
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	35−40
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 460% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	3−4	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	12−14	65−70
medium / 1080p	4−5	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K220Q and Quadro K2200M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	85−90	200−210
ultra / 1080p	35−40	110−120
QHD / 1440p	−	85−90
4K / 2160p	10−11	45−50
high / 768p	60−65	160−170
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 146% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	40−45	100−110
ultra / 1080p	18−20	75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	9−10	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	120−130
medium / 1080p	7−8	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 293% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	3−4	30−35
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	14−16	65−70
medium / 1080p	5−6	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 462% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	40−45	100−110
medium / 768p	−	90−95
high / 1080p	3−4	40−45
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	2−3
low / 720p	3−4	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	4−5	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	7−8	70−75
medium / 768p	6−7	45−50
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 860% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GRID K220Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K220Q	Quadro K2200M
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell
Code name	GK104	GM107
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 July 2014	19 July 2014
Pipelines	1536	640
Core clock speed	745 MHz	667 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	26.68
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	853.8 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	80 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.0
Optimus		+
Display Port		1.2
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
nView Display Management		+

GRID K220Q vs Quadro K2200M

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares