GRID K220Q vs Quadro K3000M
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K3000M are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 91 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 2200 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Battlefield 5 is 157% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 43% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Fortnite is 75% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 62% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Minecraft is 31% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 175% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 280% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro K3000M in World of Tanks is 26% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro K3000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK104 | N14E-Q1 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 1 June 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 576 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 654 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 31.39 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 753.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | + |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |