GRID K220Q vs Quadro M2000

When comparing GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GRID K220Q

Quadro M2000 Check Price

Main Specs

	GRID K220Q	Quadro M2000
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR5	128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
		Check Price

GRID K220Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 51 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M2000 is 1612 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	1−2	21−24
ultra / 1080p	0−1	12−14
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	10−12	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	3−4	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 720p	12−14	65−70
medium / 1080p	4−5	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	110−120	230−240
medium / 768p	85−90	200−210
ultra / 1080p	35−40	120−130
QHD / 1440p	−	90−95
4K / 2160p	10−11	50−55
high / 768p	60−65	170−180
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 154% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	14−16	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	120−130
medium / 768p	40−45	100−110
ultra / 1080p	18−20	80−85
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Dota 2 is 136% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	2−3	24−27
ultra / 1080p	2−3	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
low / 720p	9−10	50−55
medium / 1080p	3−4	27−30
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	30−35
ultra / 1080p	5−6	24−27
QHD / 1440p	1−2	16−18
low / 720p	45−50	120−130
medium / 1080p	7−8	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Fortnite is 300% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	3−4	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	27−30
QHD / 1440p	0−1	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	14−16	70−75
medium / 1080p	5−6	40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 525% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	40−45	100−110
medium / 768p	−	95−100
high / 1080p	3−4	40−45
ultra / 1080p	2−3	16−18
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
medium / 720p	35−40	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	1−2	12−14
ultra / 1080p	0−1	10−11
QHD / 1440p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	3−4	40−45
medium / 1080p	2−3	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	85−90	120−130
high / 1080p	55−60	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	−
ultra / 1080p	12−14	14−16
low / 720p	24−27	70−75
medium / 1080p	14−16	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	3−4	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	4−5	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 550% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	7−8	75−80
medium / 768p	6−7	45−50
high / 1080p	3−4	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	0−1	8−9
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 900% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p	70−75	90−95
medium / 768p	35−40	60−65
ultra / 1080p	12−14	40−45
high / 768p	30−33	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000 in World of Tanks is 65% more, than GRID K220Q.

Full Specs

	GRID K220Q	Quadro M2000
Architecture	Kepler	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	GK104	GM206
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	2 July 2014	8 April 2016
Pipelines	1536	768
Core clock speed	745 MHz	796 MHz
Boost Clock		1163 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	55.82
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	1,812 gflops
Length		201 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12
Shader Model	5.1	5
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	+
CUDA	3.0	5.2
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		215 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro		+
Mosaic		+
Width		1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays		4
nView Desktop Management		+
		Check Price

GRID K220Q vs Quadro M2000

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares