GRID K220Q vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K220Q
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 309% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M2000M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M2000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 293 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q and Quadro M2000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 125% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 625% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 266% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 450% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 475% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1197 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 173 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |