GRID K220Q vs Quadro M3000M
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro M3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro M3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M3000M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro M3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro M3000M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro M3000M.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro M3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M3000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M3000M is 305 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q and Quadro M3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q and Quadro M3000M is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro M3000M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M3000M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro M3000M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Code name | GK104 | GM204 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 1,024 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 67.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,150 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 253 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |