GRID K220Q vs Quadro M4000
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro M4000 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro M4000 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
GRID K220Q
Quadro M4000
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
120 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
8 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K220Q has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GRID K220Q has 504 GB more memory, than Quadro M4000.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro M4000 - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 28 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q and Quadro M4000 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000 is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
10−12
60−65
medium / 1080p
2−3
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
3−4
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
12−14
100−110
medium / 1080p
4−5
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GRID K220Q and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
110−120
250−260
medium / 768p
85−90
220−230
ultra / 1080p
35−40
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
10−11
70−75
high / 768p
60−65
210−220
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GRID K220Q and Quadro M4000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
70−75
120−130
medium / 768p
40−45
110−120
ultra / 1080p
18−20
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
2−3
45−50
ultra / 1080p
2−3
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
9−10
80−85
medium / 1080p
3−4
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
5−6
45−50
QHD / 1440p
1−2
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
45−50
180−190
medium / 1080p
7−8
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
3−4
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
14−16
100−110
medium / 1080p
5−6
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
40−45
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
3−4
70−75
ultra / 1080p
2−3
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
1−2
24−27
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
3−4
65−70
medium / 1080p
2−3
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
85−90
130−140
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
100−110
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
3−4
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
4−5
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
7−8
130−140
medium / 768p
6−7
85−90
high / 1080p
3−4
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
high / 768p
30−33
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q.
Full Specs
GRID K220Q
Quadro M4000
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Code name
GK104
GM204
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 July 2014
29 June 2015
Pipelines
1536
1664
Core clock speed
745 MHz
773 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
80.39
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
2,573 gflops
Length
241 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12
Shader Model
5.1
5
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
+
CUDA
3.0
5.2
SLI options
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
299 Mh/s
3D Vision Pro
+
Mosaic
+
Width
1" (2.5 cm)
Number of simultaneous displays
4
nView Desktop Management
+
Multi-display synchronization
Quadro Sync
High-Performance Video I/O6
+
Check Price