GRID K220Q vs Quadro P2000 Max Q
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Quadro P2000 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Quadro P2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 508 GB more memory, than Quadro P2000 Max Q.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 470 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro P2000 Max Q - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P2000 Max Q is 1008 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 840% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 914% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 206% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GRID K220Q and Quadro P2000 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 161% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 526% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 875% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 55% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro P2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Quadro P2000 Max Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | GK104 | GP107GL |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 5 July 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1215 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |