GRID K220Q vs Radeon Pro 450
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Radeon Pro 450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K220Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 510 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID K220Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 55 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 328% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K220Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 95% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 450% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 193% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 312% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK104 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |