GRID K220Q vs Tesla C2070
In this comparison between GRID K220Q and Tesla C2070 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K220Q will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2070 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K220Q
Tesla C2070
Main Specs
| GRID K220Q | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2070 has 5% more power consumption, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K220Q has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla C2070.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 380% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K220Q and Tesla C2070 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 122% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 550% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 233% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 387% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K220Q | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 July 2014 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 2.0 |