GRID K220Q vs Tesla C2075
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K220Q and Tesla C2075, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K220Q stacks up against Tesla C2075, check out specs charts below.
GRID K220Q
Main Specs
GRID K220Q
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
512 MB
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 9% more power consumption, than GRID K220Q.
GRID K220Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2075 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
GRID K220Q has 506 GB more memory, than Tesla C2075.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of GRID K220Q is 171 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
GRID K220Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K220Q is 1868 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
1−2
16−18
ultra / 1080p
0−1
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
10−12
35−40
medium / 1080p
2−3
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
3−4
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
12−14
55−60
medium / 1080p
4−5
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 428% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
110−120
210−220
medium / 768p
85−90
190−200
ultra / 1080p
35−40
100−110
QHD / 1440p
−
65−70
4K / 2160p
10−11
30−35
high / 768p
60−65
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 125% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
110−120
medium / 768p
40−45
100−110
ultra / 1080p
18−20
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
2−3
21−24
ultra / 1080p
2−3
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
0−1
6−7
low / 720p
9−10
45−50
medium / 1080p
3−4
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
1−2
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
110−120
medium / 1080p
7−8
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
3−4
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−11
low / 720p
14−16
60−65
medium / 1080p
5−6
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 412% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
40−45
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
3−4
30−35
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
medium / 720p
35−40
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 187% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
1−2
10−12
ultra / 1080p
0−1
8−9
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
3−4
30−35
medium / 1080p
2−3
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 850% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
high / 1080p
55−60
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
60−65
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 88% more, than GRID K220Q.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
3−4
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
4−5
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
7−8
60−65
medium / 768p
6−7
35−40
high / 1080p
3−4
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
0−1
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 700% more, than GRID K220Q.
low / 768p
70−75
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
35−40
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q.
Full Specs
GRID K220Q
Tesla C2075
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi 2.0
Code name
GK104
GF110
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 July 2014
25 July 2011
Pipelines
1536
448
Core clock speed
745 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
32.14
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
N/A
CUDA
3.0
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
