GRID K220Q vs Tesla M10
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K220Q and Tesla M10, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K220Q stacks up against Tesla M10, check out specs charts below.
GRID K220Q
Tesla M10
Main Specs
GRID K220Q | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K220Q has 504 GB more memory, than Tesla M10.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K220Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 288 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
- GRID K220Q and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 200 MHz higher, than GRID K220Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 420% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 253% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than GRID K220Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 63% more, than GRID K220Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K220Q | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | GK104 | GM107 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 2 July 2014 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.0 |