FirePro M7740 vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between FirePro M7740 and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M7740 will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
FirePro M7740 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M7740 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M7740 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 275% more power consumption, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro M7740 and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FirePro M7740 is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro M7740 is build with Terascale 1 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 95 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
- FirePro M7740 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4000 MHz higher, than FirePro M7740.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M7740 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than FirePro M7740. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M7740 | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Terascale 1 | Kepler |
| Code name | RV740 | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 4 August 2009 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 826 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 832.0 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 54.14 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |