FirePro S7000 vs GRID K240Q

In this comparison between FirePro S7000 and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S7000 will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro S7000

GRID K240Q

Main Specs

	FirePro S7000	GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)	350 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

FirePro S7000 has 55% more power consumption, than GRID K240Q.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S7000 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 205 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
FirePro S7000 and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 200 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	21−24	10−11
ultra / 1080p	12−14	6−7
QHD / 1440p	7−8	1−2
4K / 2160p	5−6	−
low / 720p	40−45	21−24
medium / 1080p	27−30	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	16−18
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
QHD / 1440p	12−14	0−1
4K / 2160p	8−9	−
low / 720p	70−75	35−40
medium / 1080p	35−40	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	230−240	170−180
medium / 768p	200−210	140−150
ultra / 1080p	120−130	75−80
QHD / 1440p	95−100	40−45
4K / 2160p	50−55	30−33
high / 768p	170−180	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 52% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	60−65	55−60
ultra / 1080p	50−55	27−30
medium / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	120−130	95−100
medium / 768p	110−120	75−80
ultra / 1080p	80−85	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 44% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	24−27	12−14
ultra / 1080p	24−27	10−12
QHD / 1440p	20−22	−
4K / 2160p	8−9	4−5
low / 720p	55−60	27−30
medium / 1080p	27−30	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 107% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	30−35	18−20
ultra / 1080p	24−27	14−16
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	120−130	75−80
medium / 1080p	75−80	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 75% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	35−40	18−20
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
QHD / 1440p	14−16	4−5
4K / 2160p	14−16	−
low / 720p	70−75	35−40
medium / 1080p	40−45	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 105% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	65−70
medium / 768p	95−100	60−65
high / 1080p	40−45	20−22
ultra / 1080p	18−20	9−10
QHD / 1440p	8−9	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	7−8
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
QHD / 1440p	10−11	−
4K / 2160p	3−4	1−2
low / 720p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	18−20	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	120−130	100−110
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	110−120	100−105
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	70−75	40−45
medium / 1080p	18−20	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
4K / 2160p	1−2	−
low / 720p	40−45	20−22
medium / 1080p	21−24	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	75−80	35−40
medium / 768p	45−50	24−27
high / 1080p	27−30	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
4K / 2160p	9−10	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 94% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	90−95	90−95
medium / 768p	60−65	50−55
ultra / 1080p	40−45	27−30
high / 768p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	FirePro S7000	GRID K240Q
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Kepler
Code name	Pitcairn	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 August 2012	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1280	1536
Core clock speed	950 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,800 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	76.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,432 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	292 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4800 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	153.6 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0
Bus support	PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	272 Mh/s
Form factor	full height / full length
DisplayPort count	1
Dual-link DVI support	+

FirePro S7000 vs GRID K240Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares