FirePro V5800 vs GRID K240Q

In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FirePro V5800

GRID K240Q

Main Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)	74 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	No outputs

GRID K240Q has 204% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FirePro V5800 and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 55 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	6−7	10−11
ultra / 1080p	4−5	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	16−18	21−24
medium / 1080p	7−8	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 62% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	16−18
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FirePro V5800 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	130−140	170−180
medium / 768p	100−110	140−150
ultra / 1080p	50−55	75−80
QHD / 1440p	27−30	40−45
4K / 2160p	27−30	30−33
high / 768p	75−80	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	75−80	95−100
medium / 768p	55−60	75−80
ultra / 1080p	30−35	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 34% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	7−8	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	10−12
4K / 2160p	3−4	4−5
low / 720p	18−20	27−30
medium / 1080p	8−9	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	14−16	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
low / 720p	55−60	75−80
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	10−12	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	14−16
QHD / 1440p	1−2	4−5
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	12−14	21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 58% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	50−55	65−70
medium / 768p	40−45	60−65
high / 1080p	10−12	20−22
ultra / 1080p	6−7	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 42% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	4−5	7−8
ultra / 1080p	3−4	5−6
4K / 2160p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	10−12	20−22
medium / 1080p	6−7	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	90−95	100−110
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	80−85	90−95
medium / 1080p	90−95	100−105
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	16−18	18−20
ultra / 1080p	14−16	16−18
low / 720p	30−35	40−45
medium / 1080p	16−18	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro V5800.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	7−8	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	10−12	20−22
medium / 1080p	10−11	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	21−24	35−40
medium / 768p	16−18	24−27
high / 1080p	9−10	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than FirePro V5800.
low / 768p	85−90	90−95
medium / 768p	40−45	50−55
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
high / 768p	35−40	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 19% more, than FirePro V5800.

Full Specs

	FirePro V5800	GRID K240Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Juniper	GK104
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	26 April 2010	28 June 2013
Pipelines	800	1536
Core clock speed	690 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	1,040 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	27.60	95.36
Floating-point performance	1,104.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	229 mm
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FirePro V5800 vs GRID K240Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares