FirePro W4100 vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between FirePro W4100 and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W4100 and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
FirePro W4100
GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than FirePro W4100.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W4100 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W4100 is build with GCN architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 115 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
FirePro W4100 and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W4100.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
6−7
10−11
ultra / 1080p
4−5
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
16−18
21−24
medium / 1080p
8−9
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
12−14
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W4100 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
130−140
170−180
medium / 768p
110−120
140−150
ultra / 1080p
50−55
75−80
QHD / 1440p
30−33
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
80−85
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
80−85
95−100
medium / 768p
60−65
75−80
ultra / 1080p
30−35
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
8−9
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
10−12
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
14−16
low / 720p
60−65
75−80
medium / 1080p
21−24
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
low / 720p
24−27
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
50−55
65−70
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
high / 1080p
12−14
20−22
ultra / 1080p
6−7
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
5−6
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
5−6
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
12−14
20−22
medium / 1080p
6−7
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
90−95
medium / 1080p
90−95
100−105
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
30−35
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than FirePro W4100.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
12−14
20−22
medium / 1080p
10−12
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
24−27
35−40
medium / 768p
16−18
24−27
high / 1080p
9−10
12−14
ultra / 1080p
6−7
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than FirePro W4100.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
20−22
27−30
high / 768p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FirePro W4100.
Full Specs
FirePro W4100
GRID K240Q
Architecture
GCN
Kepler
Code name
Cape Verde
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
2 October 2015
28 June 2013
Pipelines
512
1536
Core clock speed
630 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
20.16
95.36
Floating-point performance
645.1 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
171 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
72 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
79 Mh/s
Form factor
low profile / half length
Dual-link DVI support
+
AppAcceleration
+
Check Price
