FirePro W600 vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between FirePro W600 and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W600 will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
FirePro W600
GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)
75 Watt
225 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
6x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than FirePro W600.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro W600 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FirePro W600 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FirePro W600 is 5 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
FirePro W600 and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 1000 MHz higher, than FirePro W600.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
8−9
10−11
ultra / 1080p
5−6
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
14−16
16−18
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
27−30
35−40
medium / 1080p
14−16
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 29% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
FirePro W600 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
150−160
170−180
medium / 768p
120−130
140−150
ultra / 1080p
60−65
75−80
QHD / 1440p
30−35
40−45
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
90−95
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
65−70
75−80
ultra / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 15% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
10−11
12−14
ultra / 1080p
9−10
10−12
4K / 2160p
4−5
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−11
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
16−18
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
27−30
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 19% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
30−35
35−40
medium / 1080p
16−18
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
55−60
65−70
medium / 768p
50−55
60−65
high / 1080p
14−16
20−22
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
5−6
7−8
ultra / 1080p
4−5
5−6
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
7−8
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
85−90
90−95
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−105
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
18−20
18−20
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
40−45
medium / 1080p
18−20
20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than FirePro W600.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
20−22
medium / 1080p
12−14
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
30−33
35−40
medium / 768p
18−20
24−27
high / 1080p
10−12
12−14
ultra / 1080p
7−8
8−9
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than FirePro W600.
low / 768p
85−90
90−95
medium / 768p
45−50
50−55
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
high / 768p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than FirePro W600.
Full Specs
FirePro W600
GRID K240Q
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Cape Verde
GK104
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
13 June 2012
28 June 2013
Pipelines
512
1536
Core clock speed
750 MHz
745 MHz
Transistor count
1,500 million
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
24.00
95.36
Floating-point performance
768.0 gflops
2,289 gflops
Length
163 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4000 MHz
5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
64 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
