FirePro W7170M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between FirePro W7170M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W7170M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
FirePro W7170M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W7170M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W7170M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than FirePro W7170M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W7170M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- FirePro W7170M is used in Mobile workstations, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- FirePro W7170M is build with GCN 3 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 22 MHz higher, than FirePro W7170M.
- FirePro W7170M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W7170M and GRID K240Q is 5000 MHz.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Dota 2 is 37% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Far Cry 5 is 85% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Fortnite is 70% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Metro Exodus is 77% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 83% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7170M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7170M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | GCN 3 | Kepler |
| Code name | Tonga | GK104 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 October 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 723 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.54 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |