FireStream 9370 vs GRID K240Q

When comparing FireStream 9370 and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9370

GRID K240Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K240Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	10−11
ultra / 1080p	7−8	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	27−30	21−24
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	18−20	14−16
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
FireStream 9370 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	170−180
medium / 768p	160−170	140−150
ultra / 1080p	85−90	75−80
QHD / 1440p	45−50	40−45
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	120−130	110−120
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	35−40	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
medium / 768p	85−90	75−80
ultra / 1080p	55−60	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	10−12
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	16−18	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	16−18	−
low / 720p	85−90	75−80
medium / 1080p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 16% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	7−8	4−5
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	24−27	21−24
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	75−80	65−70
medium / 768p	65−70	60−65
high / 1080p	24−27	20−22
ultra / 1080p	10−11	9−10
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 12% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	8−9	7−8
ultra / 1080p	6−7	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	24−27	20−22
medium / 1080p	10−12	9−10
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	95−100	90−95
medium / 1080p	100−110	100−105
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	16−18
low / 720p	50−55	40−45
medium / 1080p	21−24	20−22
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GRID K240Q.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	20−22
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	45−50	35−40
medium / 768p	27−30	24−27
high / 1080p	16−18	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	50−55
ultra / 1080p	30−35	27−30
high / 768p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GRID K240Q.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID K240Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Kepler
Code name	Cypress	GK104
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	28 June 2013
Pipelines	1600	1536
Core clock speed	825 MHz	745 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	95.36
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	2,289 gflops
Length	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		3.0

FireStream 9370 vs GRID K240Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares