GeForce 820A vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 820A and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 820A is 30 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 820A and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GF117 | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 96 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 2.1 | 3.0 |