GeForce 840A vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GeForce 840A and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 840A will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 840A
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GeForce 840A | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 840A.
- GeForce 840A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 840A has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 840A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 840A is 284 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 840A and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce 840A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 840A and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 840A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 68% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than GeForce 840A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce 840A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 840A | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM108 | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 3.0 |