GeForce 8800 GTX vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce 8800 GTX and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 8800 GTX and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce 8800 GTX
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
| GeForce 8800 GTX | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 155 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 45% more power consumption, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is connected by PCIe 1.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 8800 GTX has 767 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is build with Tesla architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 169 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
- GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by 90 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4100 MHz higher, than GeForce 8800 GTX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 8800 GTX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than GeForce 8800 GTX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 8800 GTX | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Tesla | Kepler |
| Code name | G80 | GK104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 November 2006 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 128 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 576 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 681 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 345.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Length | 270 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 575 | |
| SLI options | + | |