GeForce 920M vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce 920M and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce 920M stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GeForce 920M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 920M.
- GeForce 920M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 920M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920M is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 920M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than GeForce 920M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GM-S | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 January 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 40 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |