GeForce 920MX vs GRID K240Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920MX and GRID K240Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920MX and GRID K240Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
GeForce 920MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 920MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 920MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 1306% more power consumption, than GeForce 920MX.
- GeForce 920MX is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920MX has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 920MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 920MX is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 920MX is 220 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 920MX and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce 920MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920MX and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 920MX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 250% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 85% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 160% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 180% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than GeForce 920MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920MX | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 602.1 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| Check Price |