GeForce 9800M GT SLI vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
GeForce 9800M GT SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 9800M GT SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 9800M GT SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI has 511 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 245 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
- GeForce 9800M GT SLI is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4200 MHz higher, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 85% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−105 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 50% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 39% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 48% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 64% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 53% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 55% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 61% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 27% more, than GeForce 9800M GT SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 9800M GT SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB9E-GT2 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |