GeForce GT 730M vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GeForce GT 730M and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 730M will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GT 730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 730M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 730M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 730M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 730M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GT 730M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 730M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 20 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
- GeForce GT 730M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 730M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 360% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GT 730M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 68% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 126% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 333% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 525% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 48% more, than GeForce GT 730M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 730M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.20 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 552.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64/128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 31 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |