GeForce GT 755M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce GT 755M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 755M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 235 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GT 755M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 400 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 37% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 755M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 19% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 28% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N14P- | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |