GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GRID K240Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K240Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 1650 mobile and GRID K240Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 mobile here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 mobile.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is build with Turing architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 650 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile is 3000 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 260% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Battlefield 5 is 209% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 82% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Dota 2 is 55% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Far Cry 5 is 235% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Fortnite is 175% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Forza Horizon 4 is 231% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Grand Theft Auto V is 132% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Metro Exodus is 244% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Minecraft is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 176% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 244% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 mobile in World of Tanks is 21% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 mobile | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Code name | N18P-G0, N18P-G61 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 99.84 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 3.0 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs FirePro W8100
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GRID K240Q vs FirePro W8100
- GRID K240Q vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon HD 7770
- GeForce GTX 1650 mobile vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 7770
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon RX Vega 11