GeForce GTX 260M SLI vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260M SLI stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 260M SLI is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 260M SLI is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 260M SLI here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 50% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 195 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
- GeForce GTX 260M SLI is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4050 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 260M SLI. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 260M SLI | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
| Code name | NB9E-GTX | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 224 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1508 Million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | DirectX 10, Shader 4.0 | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |