GeForce GTX 295 vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 28% more power consumption, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1791 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 497 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 295 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 68% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GT200B | GK104 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |