GeForce GTX 485M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 485M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 485M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 485M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 485M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 485M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 485M has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 485M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 485M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 361 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
- GeForce GTX 485M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 485M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Battlefield 5 is 13% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 485M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Dota 2 is 8% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Far Cry 5 is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Fortnite is 13% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Forza Horizon 4 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Minecraft is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 485M in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 485M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GTX-A1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 6 January 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 384 | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 883.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 96.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |