GeForce GTX 560M vs GRID K240Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K240Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 560M stacks up against GRID K240Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 560M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 560M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 560M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 560M.
- GeForce GTX 560M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 560M has 1535 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 560M is build with Fermi architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 560M is 30 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 560M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K240Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3750 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 560M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 69% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 560M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 560M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 560M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Fermi | Kepler |
| Code name | N12E-GS | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | |
| 3D Gaming | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |