GeForce GTX 670MX vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 3 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 670MX has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 670MX is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 145 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 670MX and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 670MX | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | N13E-GR | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2012 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 960 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 48.0 billion/sec | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,154 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 960 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| HDCP | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |