GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 110% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 86% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 40% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 70% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 89% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 60% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 88% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 34% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 61% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 88% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |