GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950M will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 950M | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 950M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 950M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 169 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Battlefield 5 is 27% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Far Cry 5 is 28% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Fortnite is 18% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Minecraft is 5% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 22% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 950M | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16P-GT | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |