GeForce GTX 960M vs GRID K240Q
When choosing between GeForce GTX 960M and GRID K240Q, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 960M and GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K240Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 351 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce GTX 960M and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 54% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 46% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | N16P-GX | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |