GeForce MX110 vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GeForce MX110 and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce MX110 and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce MX110 | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5/DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce MX110 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce MX110 is used in Laptops, and GRID K240Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce MX110 is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K240Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 220 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GeForce MX110 and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 44% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce MX110 and GRID K240Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 55% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 37% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 20% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 17% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce MX110 | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16V-GMR1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 January 2018 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 965 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 23.83 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 762.6 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |