GRID K140Q vs GRID K240Q
In this comparison between GRID K140Q and GRID K240Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K140Q will be the best choice, for others GRID K240Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K140Q
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
| GRID K140Q | GRID K240Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K140Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K140Q and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K140Q and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K140Q is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K140Q and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K140Q.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K140Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 89% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 159% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 328% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1150% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GRID K140Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K140Q | GRID K240Q | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |