GRID K160Q vs GRID K240Q
When comparing GRID K160Q and GRID K240Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K160Q and GRID K240Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID K240Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 73% more power consumption, than GRID K160Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K240Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K240Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GRID K160Q is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K160Q and GRID K240Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3218 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 475% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 75−80 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 96% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 147% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 328% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 60−65 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−105 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 62% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 733% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 61% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K160Q | GRID K240Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | GK107 | GK104 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 192 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 13.60 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 326.4 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 28.51 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 3.0 |