GRID K240Q vs GRID M6 8Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and GRID M6 8Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against GRID M6 8Q, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID M6 8Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | GRID M6 8Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- GRID K240Q has 125% more power consumption, than GRID M6 8Q.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GRID M6 8Q has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and GRID M6 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 23 MHz higher, than GRID M6 8Q.
- GRID K240Q and GRID M6 8Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M6 8Q is 12 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 90% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 71% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Fortnite is 56% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 73% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M6 8Q in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | GRID M6 8Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GK104 | GM204 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 722 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 69.31 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,218 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | 5.2 |