GRID K240Q vs Iris Graphics 5100
When comparing GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 650% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 545 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 120% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 49% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 180% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | − |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 157% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 30% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GK104 | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |