GRID K240Q vs Iris Graphics 550
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 550 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Graphics 550 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Iris Graphics 550 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 64 MB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 63 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Iris Graphics 550 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 11% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 11% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 12% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Iris Graphics 550 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | GK104 | Skylake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 52.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.97 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |