GRID K240Q vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GRID K240Q
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
| GRID K240Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 32 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K240Q and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 170−180 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 27% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 19% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K240Q | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
| Code name | GK104 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 3 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 48 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 189 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 55.20 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 883 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |