GRID K240Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GRID K240Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GRID K240Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GRID K240Q

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Check Price

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Laptops

Main Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	15 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x1
Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

GRID K240Q has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 445 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	10−11	4−5
ultra / 1080p	6−7	3−4
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	16−18	−
ultra / 1080p	14−16	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	16−18
medium / 1080p	18−20	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GRID K240Q and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	170−180	110−120
medium / 768p	140−150	85−90
ultra / 1080p	75−80	40−45
QHD / 1440p	40−45	24−27
4K / 2160p	30−33	−
high / 768p	110−120	60−65
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	95−100	70−75
medium / 768p	75−80	45−50
ultra / 1080p	45−50	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 54% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	12−14	6−7
ultra / 1080p	10−12	5−6
4K / 2160p	4−5	3−4
low / 720p	27−30	12−14
medium / 1080p	12−14	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	18−20	12−14
ultra / 1080p	14−16	8−9
low / 720p	75−80	50−55
medium / 1080p	35−40	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 68% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	18−20	9−10
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	35−40	18−20
medium / 1080p	21−24	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	65−70	40−45
medium / 768p	60−65	35−40
high / 1080p	20−22	8−9
ultra / 1080p	9−10	5−6
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	7−8	3−4
ultra / 1080p	5−6	2−3
4K / 2160p	1−2	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	8−9
medium / 1080p	9−10	5−6
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	80−85
ultra / 1080p	90−95	70−75
medium / 1080p	100−105	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 22% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	18−20	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	40−45	24−27
medium / 1080p	20−22	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	8−9	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	20−22	8−9
medium / 1080p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	35−40	16−18
medium / 768p	24−27	12−14
high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	8−9	5−6
4K / 2160p	7−8	−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 110% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
low / 768p	90−95	80−85
medium / 768p	50−55	35−40
ultra / 1080p	27−30	14−16
high / 768p	45−50	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.

Full Specs

	GRID K240Q	Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Architecture	Kepler	Gen. 8 Broadwell
Code name	GK104	Broadwell GT3e
Type	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	28 June 2013	2 June 2015
Pipelines	1536	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost Clock		1150 MHz
Transistor count	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	95.36	40.80
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops	883.2 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory		+
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	3.0
Laptop size		medium sized
Quick Sync		+
		Check Price

GRID K240Q vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares