GRID K240Q vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
In this comparison between GRID K240Q and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID K240Q will be the best choice, for others Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K240Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GRID K240Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K240Q is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GRID K240Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GRID K240Q is 345 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GRID K240Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 130% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 109% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 170−180 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 140−150 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 110−120 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 34% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 47% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 114% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 86% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 110% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 16% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 42% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 76% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 111% more, than GRID K240Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 14% more, than GRID K240Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K240Q | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | Kepler | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GK104 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1350 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon HD 7770
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon HD 7770
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon RX Vega 11
- GRID K240Q vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GRID K240Q vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395