GRID K240Q vs NVS 510
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K240Q and NVS 510, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K240Q stacks up against NVS 510, check out specs charts below.
GRID K240Q
Main Specs
GRID K240Q
NVS 510
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
GRID K240Q has 542% more power consumption, than NVS 510.
GRID K240Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and NVS 510 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
NVS 510 has 1 GB more memory, than GRID K240Q.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
GRID K240Q and NVS 510 are build with Kepler architecture.
Core clock speed of NVS 510 is 52 MHz higher, than GRID K240Q.
GRID K240Q and NVS 510 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GRID K240Q is 3218 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
10−11
0−1
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
low / 720p
21−24
1−2
medium / 1080p
12−14
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
170−180
60−65
medium / 768p
140−150
27−30
ultra / 1080p
75−80
7−8
QHD / 1440p
40−45
−
4K / 2160p
30−33
−
high / 768p
110−120
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 357% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
ultra / 1080p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K240Q.
low / 768p
95−100
45−50
medium / 768p
75−80
10−11
ultra / 1080p
45−50
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Dota 2 is 200% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
10−12
−
4K / 2160p
4−5
−
low / 720p
27−30
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
75−80
21−24
medium / 1080p
35−40
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Fortnite is 250% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
18−20
0−1
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
0−1
medium / 1080p
21−24
0−1
low / 768p
65−70
18−20
medium / 768p
60−65
−
high / 1080p
20−22
0−1
ultra / 1080p
9−10
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
low / 768p
100−110
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
90−95
−
medium / 1080p
100−105
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in Minecraft is 36% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
18−20
−
ultra / 1080p
16−18
−
low / 720p
40−45
8−9
medium / 1080p
20−22
−
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
12−14
−
low / 768p
35−40
0−1
medium / 768p
24−27
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 768p
90−95
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
14−16
ultra / 1080p
27−30
0−1
high / 768p
45−50
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GRID K240Q in World of Tanks is 156% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
GRID K240Q
NVS 510
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Code name
GK104
GK107
Type
Workstation
Workstation
Release date
28 June 2013
23 October 2012
Pipelines
1536
192
Core clock speed
745 MHz
797 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
95.36
12.75
Floating-point performance
2,289 gflops
306.0 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5000 MHz
1782 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
28.51 GB/s
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.126
CUDA
3.0
3.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
Check Price